Services - We are experiencing an extraordinary triumph of science:
he deployment of new vaccines that promise to stop an epidemic that just a year ago seemed invincible.

When attacks on science threaten our existence. just as governments and health organizations around the world rush to protect billions of people, the malicious agents of death and despair are working just as hard to convince anyone that these vaccines that save Lives are dangerous, ineffective or global minded. . Control plan.

As we report in this special issue, misinformation and deliberate misinformation about vaccines is rampant, and nothing new. The introduction of the smallpox vaccine in the late 18th century sparked decades of opposition, even though vaccination changed the rules of the game: the virus was killing up to 30 percent of those infected.

As freelance writer Tara Healey reports, anti-vaccination groups argued that requiring vaccines violated individual freedoms and interfered with parents’ rights to “protect their children from disease.” Those trying to outlaw vaccines today, from those that protect against COVID-19 to measles and more, use similar arguments.

Most people are anxious to get the COVID-19 vaccine and get back to normal life; In the United States, more than half of people over the age of 18 had received at least one injection by mid-April. But nearly 20 percent of American adults say they are still reluctant to get vaccinated, and favoritism is a big factor.

43 percent of Republicans say they would refrain from getting vaccinated, compared with 5 percent of Democrats. , according to a survey by Monmouth University. Mainstream conservative media outlets, including Fox News, have promoted an unproven COVID-19 cure and attacked scientists for targeting them, saying they don’t yet know the answer.

And such as when a Johnson & Johnson vaccine is rare. cause severe bleeding. Scientists under the clotting attack include Anthony Fauci, leader of the COVID-19 response teams from the Trump and Biden administrations. Uncertainty is uncomfortable, but it is intrinsic to the process of science.

It is intrinsic to the process of science. The shift to social media as the primary source of news has accelerated the spread of anti-science propaganda around the world. But as contributing correspondent Alexandra Witz reports, the message flood study has given researchers a better understanding of why false information is so compelling.

Recent work has begun to reveal ways in which the general public, scientists, and social media platforms can identify lies. Senior writer Laura Sanders maps the anatomy of misinformation, with real-world examples that hook us. And Earth and Climate writer Carolyn Gremling talks about her work with scientists to counter decades-long attempts to counter doubts about the realities of climate change.

Growing up the daughter of a physicist and an entrepreneur, I was exposed to Science News at a young age. I enjoyed reading the latest discoveries in astronomy, medicine, and neuroscience, while searching for pages full of images of stars, animals, and the natural world. Seven years ago, when I began my stint as editor of Science News, I was faced with an astonishing task. They told me to sell the magazine, discontinue it, or make it durable. I considered the options and realized there was only one option: I had to turn things around to make sure Science News would survive. I couldn’t imagine that this magazine would no longer exist.

Hits: 0

error: Content is protected !!
%d bloggers like this: